For the last year I have been pondering how people exercise, or don’t exercise leadership in civic life. By civic, I mean activity in the public sphere – people working to solve difficult community, state and/or federal challenges. I work for the Kansas Leadership Center, a new organization charged with cultivating civic leadership across Kansas. We have worked hard to get to the root of what exactly we mean by “civic leadership,” and as we study the topic and talk with people across the state and nation, a key distinction regarding authority is growing larger in my mind.
Authority figures in civic life (e.g. governors, mayors, state representatives, community foundation presidents, etc.) appear to have far less authority within the realm they are working in than their counterparts in private life (e.g. CEOs, general managers, etc.). For example, a rank and file state legislator has virtually no formal authority over his or her fellow legislators, but a CEO of a company has the power to hire, fire, promote and demote company workers. Even a governor, who may be the CEO of the state government, has little formal authority over other officials in civic life. A governor can fire a state employee, but has no formal power or authority to make something happen in the legislature.
So, does a lack of authority over others require civic officials to have different or additional leadership competencies? If so, what are those competencies and how can they be developed? - Ed O’Malley