Followership and New Insights into Leadership
Monday, April 28th, 2008I have had occasion to read a bit more on followership recently. Brad Jackson and Ken Parry deal with the term and its scholarship in their recent and valuable book, A Very Short, Fairly Interesting and Reasonably Cheap Book about Studying Leadership. The Art of Followership gathers a set of provocative chapters on the topic. The authors and editors of both books have interviews in a recent and forthcoming newsletter of the ILA.
Initially, I was very put off by the term because it seems to imply hierarchy and authority as companions to leadership. We have spent a great deal of scholarship over the past 30 years trying to distinguish these terms.
Ironically, the premises of this scholarship help us make these distinctions clearly. First, leadership is distributed through a group–family, group, organization, community, polity, globe–and each person has the responsibility to maintain autonomous moral decision making. Second, the followership scholarship looks to the Holocaust and the social psychological research of Milgram, Asch, Zimbardo, and others to suggest what happens when people suspend that autonomous moral decision making because of authority or group pressure.
Two landmark studies, Fromm’s Escape from Freedom and Hirschman’s Exit, Voice, and Loyalty support further the incredible importance of speaking truth to power. So there you have it leadership entails speaking truth within a hierarchy of power and to people with authority. Followership, despite the suggestion of the term, requires leadership without authority.
More to follow… Richard A. Couto

